why your strong sense of justice can turn against you

Last Friday I answered a subscriber’s question about anger, rumination, and unfairness inside a family dynamic.

If you didn’t read that email, here’s the short version: someone behaves badly, someone else avoids dealing with it and the person in the middle ends up tense, angry, and mentally trapped in the scene.

Now, that reaction is not random. There are psychological reasons why some people get especially stuck in this kind of family injustice.

There are two things worth understanding here: why do people with a strong sense of justice tend to get especially hooked by these situations and why do family systems so often dump tension onto the wrong person.

People with a highly developed sense of justice tend to experience more rumination when they witness an injustice. Understanding this will help you manage the guilt and self-pressure that usually come with these situations.

Let’s take a look:

 

Sensitivity to inequity

Some people detect very quickly when loads and responsibilities are badly distributed. Call it high sensitivity or high sophistication in social skills. You simply notice more things than other people do. Whether that’s good or bad, it depends.

Right.

When that happens, the internal system interprets the situation as a breach of basic moral rules: shared effort, reciprocity and adult responsibility.

If that’s your case, your brain automatically registers: “This isn’t balanced. It’s not fair.”

That signal usually generates physiological activation, your body starts boiling with anger, because the injustice is perceived as something that should be corrected. But the problem appears when you don’t have the authority to correct it.

Then the moral system is left without a behavioural outlet, meaning you can’t do anything, you can’t take any action, and the energy turns into cognitive rumination, because when there is no action, our mind appears to go over things a thousand times.

What else?

Ah! Yes, the family side of it. Let’s look at that more closely:

 

Conflict between values and family hierarchy

In families, hierarchies are clear: parents have the authority in their own house and adult children occupy a different role. If the opposite happens, bad news.

But when the authority, the parents, does not enforce limits, an internal conflict appears.

Your moral system says: “This should be corrected.”

Your hierarchical system says: “It’s not my place to do it.”

That clash creates internal dissonance, a conflict between two opposing thoughts, which tends to get resolved through repetitive thinking, trying to find a solution that does not exist within the current system, and so we enter a loop.

 

Tendency to repair the system

People with a strong sense of responsibility, like the subscriber who sent the question, often adopt, without realising it, the role of regulators of the family system.

Put into practical examples, what does that mean?: helping more than necessary, anticipating other people’s needs, trying to balance tensions and holding the emotional climate together so there can be harmony.

Sound familiar? Because this is very common in families.

That pattern works well in contexts where there is reciprocity, but in systems where someone does not do their part, it can turn into a role of invisible overload.

The mind then tries to find ways to restore balance, your body is always trying to achieve homeostasis even in dysfunctional situations, and that feeds imaginary scenarios, in your mind, where order is restored.

 

Now, let me show you the exact same mechanism in a different setting. Not family, but work. Buckle up!

Imagine you’re at work and there’s one colleague who never quite pulls their weight. 

Sounds familiar? hahahhahahah 

You know: they miss deadlines, leave things half done, hand over sloppy work that someone else has to clean up afterwards, or they’re on their third coffee break of the morning.

Everybody sees it.

You see it.

Your manager probably sees it too.

But nothing is addressed clearly.

So what happens?

The work still needs to get done, the tension is still there, although it keeps building as time goes by, and little by little, the most responsible person in the team starts compensating.

You know: you double-check things that weren’t your job to check, you step in earlier than necessary, you fix mistakes that shouldn’t have landed on you in the first place, and meanwhile, you get more and more activated inside, anger building, like a pressure cooker.

Why?

Because one part of you is thinking: “This isn’t fair. Someone should deal with this.”

But another part knows: “It’s not actually my place to act like the boss here.”

And that’s the whole trap.

 

You see the problem, feel the injustice. You want order restored, but, again, you don’t really have the authority to make that happen.

It is what it is.

So the action gets blocked, and the mind takes over. It’s the only way out. Therefore: you replay the situation, you imagine conversations, you think about what should be said, what should be done, and how things should be working.

Same mechanism, but a different system.

 

The strategy that regulates this mechanism

Go and have a look at last week’s email, where I explained the most efficient strategy for getting out of this loop.

It’s about creating a frame that acts directly on these three processes:[restrict paid=”true”] 

First, recognising reality without intervening.

Second, limiting your action to your real responsibility, real, not ideal.

Third, stepping out of sacrifice and out of waiting for change.

By doing only your part and returning the rest of the responsibility that does not belong to you, the internal system stops looking for a solution that does not depend on you. That progressively reduces the need to ruminate.

Is it magic?

Can I really stop going over things and getting worked up about how unfair the situation is?

Yes! But it’s not magic, it’s strategy.

 

This will be the sign that the internal adjustment is working

Here is the sign, well, the signs, that this really DOES work. When this change settles, three clear indicators usually appear. No doubt about it:
1.You see the same scene, but you do not feel the need to correct it.
2.Anger turns into colder observation.
3.The mind stops creating future confrontation scenarios.

Clarification: it works not because the situation has changed, but because your position within the system has been redefined. And that changes the game.

 

Right. There’s still one thing left to explain: the “triangle of displaced responsibility”.

It’s quite a common pattern in family systems when one person avoids exercising authority or confronting a problem directly and tries to dodge it.

It will help you understand why you end up feeling tension and rumination even though you are not the person responsible for resolving the situation.

Meaning: it’s not only that you may have certain personality traits that make you more sensitive to injustices, it’s also that something happens inside the system that intensifies that injustice.

Wait, this email has gone on a bit too long. One concept at a time, otherwise it gets too heavy.

Next week I’ll explain that.

And, if you’re tired of going round in circles with the same pattern and want a professional perspective on your own case, you can join the waiting list for my psychological consultation here.

 

Love,

Noemi [/restrict]

Picture of Noemi Lozar

Noemi Lozar

Psychologist and writer exploring what drives your thoughts, feelings and choices. Clear guidance for people who want real change.

error: